Around the Watershed: upper Merrimack community Archive

Citizen scientists critical in monitoring water quality

By DANIEL SARCH, THE LACONIA DAILY SUN

Sep 3, 2024 

https://www.laconiadailysun.com/news/local/citizen-scientists-critical-in-monitoring-water-quality/article_1b985174-6963-11ef-b61c-eb5327a6ba14.html

FRANKLIN — Three volunteers for the Upper Merrimack Watershed Association crossed the Central Street Bridge over the Pemigewasset River, looking out over the foggy horizon. At 7 a.m. on Aug. 27, Mike Hamilton, environmental engineer for Watts Water Technologies, threw a small bucket over the bridge into the river, and pulled it up, filled with a water sample to test E. coli in the river.

Hamilton then dropped off the sample at the Franklin Wastewater Treatment Plant, where it’ll be brought to the Public Health Laboratories in Concord. Samples from 11 test sites were analyzed, and the data released at the end of that week, distributed through the watershed association newsletter. Hamilton spoke about why it’s important he help collect this data.

“I live right over here. My dogs swim in this river, so it’s a big part of the community, and just another way to give back,” he said.

The Upper Merrimack Monitoring Program is a 100% volunteer-run program of the Upper Merrimack Watershed Association. Every summer, volunteers take samples in the rivers of Merrimack County to test for E. coli bacteria every two weeks, from June 18 to Aug. 27. Co-Director Steve Landry said the samples they collect fill the gaps in the statewide river monitoring network of the New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services. The state uses the data to make assessments of river health, which is a source of pride for the volunteers, that they contribute to something beyond monitoring the local river corridor.

“I think that’s the exciting thing for volunteers like Mike and I, is that we’re participating in a river assessment program that normally wouldn’t have this intensive of a summer bacteria monitoring schedule, because the state has limited resources and abilities,” Landry said. “There’s like 17,000 river miles in New Hampshire. They can’t sample every river every other week.”

E. coli comes into the water from warm-blooded animals, including humans, that have E. coli in the gut. Positive samples indicate fecal matter has found its way into the water. This can be due to stormwater runoff, failed septic systems, poorly connected pipes transporting household waste to a treatment plant, pet or wildlife waste from within the river watershed, and other sources. To protect public health, the state has designated swimming beaches not to exceed 88 colonies of E. coli per 100 mL. All the sites are Class B waters, which cannot exceed 406 colonies. According to Co-Director Michele Tremblay, Class B is still clean. Despite being designated Class B, the site on the Pemigewasset came in at under 10 colonies of E. coli per 100 mL.

“That means that you can swim, you can fish, you can eat the fish that you catch. And if someone wanted to have an intake for a water supply system, they could do that as long as they had proper treatment,” Tremblay said.

All New Hampshire surface waters are designated Class A or B. The results, however, are snapshots in time when the sample was collected, not necessarily a determination of long-term river health, as anything that happens a day before or after can change the data drastically. An example of this was on July 2, when a sample of the Merrimack River at Garvin Falls in Bow read at 613 colonies, well above the Class B limit. While only a guess, Tremblay believes it could have been waterfowl congregating in that location, leaving behind waste. It became clear it wasn’t a serious problem after the next sample two weeks later on July 16, read at under 10 colonies.

Another indicator for poor quality may be rain.

“We always like to say, ‘When it rains, it’s poor,’” Tremblay said. “So going swimming in a river, for instance, isn’t a great idea after there’s been a big rainstorm, because everything is flushed in, from storm drains to lawns to fields. Anywhere that isn’t vegetated, all of that goes into the river.”

During past summers, watershed association volunteers set wire baskets filled with rocks in 17 sites from Franklin to Bow, which aim to catch bugs and benthic macroinvertebrates in the river. These bugs are preserved in jars, then identified during the winter to help determine the long-term health of the water. Bugs can often be a good indicator of water health, as some bugs are sensitive to large amounts of pollutants. This summer, the organization didn’t collect bugs, as they have a smaller laboratory which allows for fewer volunteers. Landry spoke to the importance of the bugs in the water.

“The aquatic insects part of it, that’s long-term river health assessments, because those bugs live in there. They’re part of the food chain,” Landry said. “We get a lot more understanding of the river and long-term river health with the bugs. But it’s a big undertaking and takes a lot of time and many, many more volunteers.”

Tremblay said they may look for bugs in November, and plan to set baskets next summer.

None of this work is done without the help of volunteers. While some volunteers already work in the environmental and sustainability industry, like Tremblay, who works as an environmental consultant, and Landry, who works for the state as an environmental program manager, many volunteers are simply concerned or curious citizens who want to help. Volunteers often come from adopt-a-river site sponsor organizations. In Franklin, this includes Franklin Savings Bank, the wastewater treatment plant, and Watts Water Technologies. Volunteers are trained to properly collect samples, and in the winter, observe bugs under a microscope for further research. Landry described volunteers viewing bugs under the microscope for the first time.

“People who had no idea that mayflies, crayfish, flies and midges live in the river, and their whole world gets brighter and [it’s] more enlightening,” Landry said.

Claudette Verville, 79, a seamstress from Allenstown, has volunteered her time to the program since 1998. The microscope observations of the bugs caught her attention. She loved it so much that over 20 years ago, her children bought her a microscope, with the advice of Tremblay and Landry. Since then, Verville has used her microscope to finish observing samples at home to speed up the identification process. In her free time, she often looks for bugs under rocks, behind leaves, and in the water. She shares her passion with her children, nieces and nephews.

“When everybody’s sitting and saying, ‘Oh God, we’re so bored,’ I’d say, ‘OK, let’s go and see what we can find,’” Verville said. “And that’s what we would do, and they’d all have a chance to take a look at whatever they found on the microscope. So that kind of made it fun and exciting.”

Ultimately, beyond the current contributions of volunteers to the local watershed, Landry hopes the experience will raise awareness of the importance of river health, and advocate for it in the future. He believes Verville’s story is a great example of inspiring passion in a new generation.

“They [will] carry that forward, maybe tell a neighbor or tell their children, and it helps kind of spread this awareness that there’s a lot of great indicators out there of river health.”

To learn more about the program and to volunteer, call Tremblay at 603-796-2615.

Merrimack watershed bacteria results: July 30, 2024

Dear river and watershed friends,

July 30, our fourth sampling day (of six) this summer continues with 100% sampling at 100% of our sites. Thank you, volunteers. We continue to provide you with these bi-weekly reports for eleven sites from Franklin to Bow, comprising the Pemigewasset, Winnipesaukee, Contoocook, and Merrimack Rivers.

We know that you have heard it before but it’s important to remember that the results shown below are the probable number of E. coli colonies for every 100 millilitres (ml) of water at that moment in time. We call it a snapshot because conditions at that moment are represented and anything that happened a day or so before or after this sampling date can change drastically. All warm blooded animals (including we humans) have E. coli in their guts. That means that bacteria are an indicator that poop has found its way to the water. This could be a result of stormwater runoff, failed septic systems, mis-connected pipes that are meant to transport household waste to a treatment plant, pet or wildlife waste from river watershed, and other sources.

To protect public health, State of New Hampshire designated swim beaches are not allowed to exceed 88 colonies of E. coli per 100ml. Class B waters (all of our sites are designated as Class B) shall not exceed 406 colonies. These designations do not always reflect real-time  water quality. The designation indicates what uses, e.g., swimming, fishing, should be supported by maintaining water quality.

Sample results were surprisingly low with all sites meeting the Class B Standard for swimmable, fishable waters. There were short, flashy rains the night before sampling so we expected some spikes from runoff but we were surprised pleasantly with these mostly very low bacteria colony counts. We continue to stress that these samples are snapshots in time, and something can happen right before or right after volunteers take these samples. These data are important for trend analysis and to help us understand correlations between weather and bacteria counts. Leonardo da Vinci said it best, “When you put your hand in a flowing stream, you touch the last that has gone before and the first of what is still to come.”

You hear us say often, “When it rains, it’s poor,” which means that you may wish to wait a day or so after it rains before recreating in a surface water.  

Here are the details.

Site number and descriptionresults
#1 Pemigewasset at Route 3, Franklin<10
#2 Winnipesaukee at Trestle, Franklin63
#3 Merrimack R. above FWWTF, Franklin52
#4 Merrimack R. below FWWTF, Franklin41
#5 Merrimack at Jamie Welch, Boscawen63
#6 Merrimack at US Route 4, Canterbury96
#7 Contoocook at Rivco, Penacook121
#8 Merrimack at Sewalls Falls, Concord63
#9 Merrimack at Manchester St., Concord20
#10 Merrimack at Blue Seal, Bow20
#11 Merrimack at Garvins Falls, Bow10

Please join us inrecognizing and thanking our Adopt-a-River Site Sponsors that make this work possible (listed in order of their sponsored sites 1-11).
Watts Regulator / Webster Valve
Franklin Savings Bank
Winnipesaukee River Basin Program (two sites)
Elektrisola
Nelson Analytical
Essex Hydro
Aries Engineering
GZA Environmental
Granite Shore Power (two sites)

Our gratitude to Franklin Waste Water Treatment Plant for their continued support, including covering sample processing costs, and providing a safe and convenient drop-off area. The Department of Health and Human Services Public Health Laboratory do a wonderful job processing our samples with prompt results. Thank you, Chantal McGuire for your sample courier-ing from Franklin to Concord.

Did you know that the Upper Merrimack Monitoring program is staffed and managed 100% by volunteers?
This means that throughout the year, volunteers organize and perform activities including water sampling, collecting benthic macroinvertebrates to gauge long-term river health, and work nights in a laboratory to identify those “bugs?” If you want to learn more or get involved, please contact Michele and Steve (see below for contact information).

Volunteers will take their next samples on Tuesday, August 13, 2024.

Please visit our forum at MerrimackRiver.org/forum and the Upper Merrimack Watershed Association site MerrimackRiver.org for further information. Don’t hesitate to contact us at UMMP@MerrimackRiver.org or 603.796.2615 (landline) should you have any questions.

Sincerely,

Michele L Tremblay                          Stephen C Landry
Program Manager                             Sampling Supervisor

Merrimack watershed bacteria results: July 2, 2024

Dear river and watershed friends,

July 2, our second sampling day (of six) this summer continues with 100% sampling at 100% of our sites. Thank you, volunteers. We continue to provide you with these bi-weekly reports for eleven sites from Franklin to Bow, comprising the Pemigewasset, Winnipesaukee, Contoocook, and Merrimack Rivers. There were short, flashy rains but nothing that would be affecting these results in a meaningful way. All of the volunteers noted clear water colour at every site.

We know that you have heard it before but it’s important to remember that the results shown below are the probable number of E. coli colonies for every 100 millilitres (ml) of water at that moment in time. We call it a snapshot because conditions at that moment are represented and anything that happened a day or so before or after this sampling date can change drastically. All warm blooded animals (including we humans) have E. coli in their guts. That means that bacteria are an indicator that poop has found its way to the water. This could be a result of stormwater runoff, failed septic systems, mis-connected pipes that are meant to transport household waste to a treatment plant, pet or wildlife waste from river watershed, and other sources.

To protect public health, State of New Hampshire designated swim beaches are not allowed to exceed 88 colonies of E. coli per 100ml. Class B waters (all of our sites are designated as Class B) shall not exceed 406 colonies. These designations do not always reflect real-time  water quality. The designation indicates what uses, e.g., swimming, fishing, should be supported by maintaining water quality.

Sample results are low and nearly all sites meet the Standard for designated swim areas, as well as the less stringent Class B Standard. In the case of Site 11, we don’t know why this sample is an outlier. Right below the dam, we have observed waterfowl congregating. Sometimes, this is a source of E. coli. We want to stress that these samples are snapshots in time, and something can happen right before or right after volunteers take these samples. These data are important for trend analysis and to help us understand correlations between weather and bacteria counts. Leonardo da Vinci said it best, “When you put your hand in a flowing stream, you touch the last that has gone before and the first of what is still to come.”

You hear us say often, “When it rains, it’s poor,” which means that you may wish to wait a day or so after it rains before recreating in a surface water.  

Here are the details.

Upper Merrimack Watershed Association data 7.2.24
Site number and descriptionresults
#1 Pemigewasset at Route 3, Franklin<10
#2 Winnipesaukee at Trestle, Franklin52
#3 Merrimack R. above FWWTF, Franklin20
#4 Merrimack R. below FWWTF, Franklin41
#5 Merrimack at Jamie Welch, Boscawen52
#6 Merrimack at US Route 4, Canterbury41
#7 Contoocook at Rivco, Penacook86
#8 Merrimack at Sewalls Falls, Concord63
#9 Merrimack at Manchester St., Concord52
#10 Merrimack at Blue Seal, Bow41
#11 Merrimack at Garvins Falls, Bow613

Please join us inrecognizing and thanking our Adopt-a-River Site Sponsors that make this work possible (listed in order of their sponsored sites 1-11).
Watts Regulator / Webster Valve
Franklin Savings Bank
Winnipesaukee River Basin Program (two sites)
Elektrisola
Nelson Analytical
Essex Hydro
Aries Engineering
GZA Environmental
Granite Shore Power (two sites)

Our gratitude to Franklin Waste Water Treatment Plant for their continued support, including covering sample processing costs, and providing a safe and convenient drop-off area. The Department of Health and Human Services Public Health Laboratory do a wonderful job processing our samples with prompt results. Thank you, Chantal McGuire for your sample courier-ing from Franklin to Concord.

Did you know that the Upper Merrimack Monitoring program is staffed and managed 100% by volunteers?
This means that throughout the year, volunteers organize and perform activities including water sampling, collecting benthic macroinvertebrates to gauge long-term river health, and work nights in a laboratory to identify those “bugs?” If you want to learn more or get involved, please contact Michele and Steve (see below for contact information).

Volunteers will take their next samples on Tuesday, July 16, 2024.

Please visit our forum at MerrimackRiver.org/forum and the Upper Merrimack Watershed Association site MerrimackRiver.org for further information. Don’t hesitate to contact us at UMMP@MerrimackRiver.org or 603.796.2615 (landline) should you have any questions.

Sincerely,

Michele L Tremblay                          Stephen C Landry
Program Manager                             Sampling Supervisor

Merrimack watershed bacteria results: June 18, 2024

Dear river and watershed friends,

June 18, Opening Day for Bacteria Days, an exciting event for we volunteers, begins our bi-weekly 2024 water quality monitoring. It was an auspicious start with 100% sampling at 100% of the eleven sites from Franklin to Bow, comprising the Pemigewasset, Winnipesaukee, Contoocook, and Merrimack Rivers. June 18 began on the first day of a “heat dome” with high air temperatures. E. coli colony counts after a relatively dry and sunny period were low, as expected with little or no runoff. 

We know that you have heard it before but it’s important to remember that the results shown below are the probable number of E. coli colonies for every 100 millilitres (ml) of water at that moment in time. We call it a snapshot because conditions at that moment are represented and anything that happened a day or so before or after this sampling date can change drastically. All warm blooded animals (including we humans) have E. coli in their guts. That means that bacteria are an indicator that poop has found its way to the water. This could be a result of stormwater runoff, failed septic systems, mis-connected pipes that are meant to transport household waste to a treatment plant, pet or wildlife waste from river watershed, and other sources.

To protect public health, State of New Hampshire designated swim beaches are not allowed to exceed 88 colonies of E. coli per 100ml. Class B waters (all of our sites are designated as Class B) shall not exceed 406 colonies. These designations do not always reflect real-time  water quality. The designation indicates what uses, e.g., swimming, fishing, should be supported by maintaining water quality.

Sample results are fairly low and all meet the Standard for designated swim areas, as well as the less stringent Class B Standard. In the case of Site 11, there are less than 10 colonies, which is excellent. We want to stress that these samples are snapshots in time, and something can happen right before or right after volunteers take these samples. These data are important for trend analysis and to help us understand correlations between weather and bacteria counts. Leonardo da Vinci said it best, “When you put your hand in a flowing stream, you touch the last that has gone before and the first of what is still to come.”

You hear us say often, “When it rains, it’s poor,” which means that you may wish to wait a day or so after it rains before recreating in a surface water.  

Here are the details.

Site number and descriptionresults
#1 Pemigewasset at Route 3, Franklin20
#2 Winnipesaukee at Trestle, Franklin41
#3 Merrimack R. above FWWTF, Franklin86
#4 Merrimack R. below FWWTF, Franklin52
#5 Merrimack at Jamie Welch, Boscawen20
#6 Merrimack at US Route 4, Canterbury41
#7 Contoocook at Rivco, Penacook63
#8 Merrimack at Sewalls Falls, Concord10
#9 Merrimack at Manchester St., Concord10
#10 Merrimack at Blue Seal, Bow30
#11 Merrimack at Garvins Falls, Bow10*

*value for Site 11 is <10

Please join us inrecognizing and thanking our Adopt-a-River Site Sponsors that make this work possible (listed in order of their sponsored sites 1-11).
Watts Regulator / Webster Valve
Franklin Savings Bank
Winnipesaukee River Basin Program (two sites)
Elektrisola
Nelson Analytical
Essex Hydro
Aries Engineering
GZA Environmental
Granite Shore Power (two sites)

Our gratitude to Franklin Waste Water Treatment Plant for their continued support, including covering sample processing costs, and providing a safe and convenient drop-off area. The Department of Health and Human Services Public Health Laboratory do a wonderful job processing our samples with prompt results. Thank you, Chantal McGuire for your sample courier-ing from Franklin to Concord.

Did you know that the Upper Merrimack Monitoring program is staffed and managed 100% by volunteers?
This means that throughout the year, volunteers organize and perform activities including water sampling, collecting benthic macroinvertebrates to gauge long-term river health, and work nights in a laboratory to identify those “bugs?” If you want to learn more or get involved, please contact Michele and Steve (see below for contact information).

Volunteers will take their next samples on Tuesday, July 2, 2024.

Please visit our forum at MerrimackRiver.org/forum and the Upper Merrimack Watershed Association site MerrimackRiver.org for further information. Don’t hesitate to contact us at UMMP@MerrimackRiver.org or 603.796.2615 (landline) should you have any questions.

Sincerely,

Michele L Tremblay                          Stephen C Landry
Program Manager                             Sampling Supervisor

Merrimack watershed bacteria results: September 6, 2022

Dear river and watershed friends,

The 2022 bacteria sampling season closed on this sixth event, September 6, 2022, with nearly 100% samples collected by 100% of its volunteers at eleven sites from Franklin to Bow.

We know that you have heard it before but it’s important to remember that the results shown below are the probable number of E. coli bacteria colonies for every 100 millilitres of water at that moment in time. We call it a snapshot because conditions at that moment are represented and anything that happened a day or so before or after this sampling date can change drastically. All warm blooded animals (including we humans) have E. coli in their guts. That means that bacteria are an indicator that poop has found its way to the water. This could be a result of stormwater runoff, failed septic systems, mis-connected pipes that are meant to transport household waste to a treatment plant, pet or wildlife waste from river watershed, and other sources.

To protect public health, State of New Hampshire designated swim beaches are not allowed to exceed 88 colonies of E. coli per 100ml. Class B waters (all of our sites are designated as Class B) shall not exceed 406 colonies. These designations do not always reflect real-time  water quality. The designation indicates what uses, e.g., swimming, fishing, should be supported by maintaining water quality.

The final sampling event results were all within the Class B standard (406 colonies per 100ml). We had only two exceedences this year with 749 colonies at Site 4 and 3,448 at Site 7 on August 9. They both resolved quickly with all sites down to double digits the following week. Even with those less-than-pleasant surprises, overall, it was a good season and we look forward to another in 2023.

You hear us say often, “When it rains, it’s poor,” which means that you may wish to wait a day or so after it rains before recreating in a surface water. 

Here are the details.

Site number and descriptionresults
#1 Pemigewasset at Route 3, Franklin74
#2 Winnipesaukee at Trestle, Franklinn/a
#3 Merrimack R. above FWWTF, Franklin31
#4 Merrimack R. below FWWTF, Franklin74
#5 Merrimack at Jamie Welch, Boscawen160
#6 Merrimack at US Route 4, Canterbury75
#7 Contoocook at Rivco, Penacook63
#8 Merrimack at Sewalls Falls, Concord41
#9 Merrimack at Manchester St., Concord74
#10 Merrimack at Blue Seal, Bow52
#11 Merrimack at Garvins Falls, Bow63

Please join us inrecognizing and thanking our Adopt-a-River Site Sponsors that make this work ppossible (listed in order of their sponsored sites).
Watts Regulator / Webster Valve
Franklin Savings Bank
Franklin Waste Water Treatment Plant (two sites)
Elektrisola
Nelson Analytical
Essex Hydro
Aries Engineering
GZA Environmental
Granite Shore Power (two sites)

Our gratitude to Franklin Waste Water Treatment Plant for their continued support, including covering sample processing costs, and providing a safe and convenient drop-off area.

Thank you, Chantal McGuire for your sample couriering. How would we do it without you?

A big thank you and gratitude to Merrimack County Savings Bank for their generous gift to the Upper Merrimack Watershed Association to purchase equipment and supplies for the Upper Merrimack Monitoring Program, which includes annual bacteria sampling and working with fellow volunteers to collect specimens and identify them at Bug Nights each winter.

Please visit our fresh and newly designed forum at MerrimackRiver.org/forum and our new, Upper Merrimack Watershed Association site at MerrimackRiver.org for further information. Don’t hesitate to contact us at UMMP@MerrimackRiver.org or 603.796.2615 should you have any questions.

Sincerely,

Michele L Tremblay                          Stephen C Landry
Program Manager                             Sampling Supervisor

Merrimack watershed bacteria results: August 23, 2022

Dear river and watershed friends,

The 2022 bacteria sampling season continues on its fifth event (only one more to go for 2022) with 100% samples at 100% of its eleven sites from Franklin to Bow.

We know that you have heard it before but it’s important to remember that the results shown below are the probable number of E. coli bacteria colonies for every 100 millilitres of water at that moment in time. We call it a snapshot because conditions at that moment are represented and anything that happened a day or so before or after this sampling date can change drastically. All warm blooded animals (including we humans) have E. coli in their guts. That means that bacteria are an indicator that poop has found its way to the water. This could be a result of stormwater runoff, failed septic systems, mis-connected pipes that are meant to transport household waste to a treatment plant, pet or wildlife waste from river watershed, and other sources.

To protect public health, State of New Hampshire designated swim beaches are not allowed to exceed 88 colonies of E. coli per 100ml. Class B waters (all of our sites are designated as Class B) shall not exceed 406 colonies. These designations do not always reflect real-time  water quality. The designation indicates what uses, e.g., swimming, fishing, should be supported by maintaining water quality.

This week’s results are far better than what we saw on August 9, where we saw an unpleasant surprise at Site 7 with 3,448 colonies of E. coli per 100ml. Because we were concerned, we re-sampled at the boat launch and just upstream of it the following Monday, August 15. The boat launch near Site 7 is a primary contact area where people put in their boats and, sometimes, swim. The river there is shallow and does not flow very much so pollutants can accumulate. That is where the August 9 sample was collected. Just upstream is a different “flow regime,” where there are riffles and swifter moving water, which is where the sample has been taken in the past. The results at the launch area were 20 colonies and upstream was 20—that’s very good! This week, the count at Site 7 is 63 (still very good). What does it all mean? On August 9, there could have been waterfowl (pooping)  in the area or another transient source of bacteria. This is why, in addition to water samples, we work to form a more detailed picture of water quality vs. a snapshot by collecting and analyzing the invertebrates that live in the river. They are always there and tell a more complete story about ongoing water conditions. 

You hear us say often, “When it rains, it’s poor,” which means that you may wish to wait a day or so after it rains before recreating in a surface water. Sample results are as of Tuesday morning, July 26, 2022. Results may change from day-to-day, depending on upstream conditions and rainstorms that may have occurred after Tuesday morning.

Here are the details.

Site number and descriptionresults
#1 Pemigewasset at Route 3, Franklin63
#2 Winnipesaukee at Trestle, Franklin20
#3 Merrimack R. above FWWTF, Franklin20
#4 Merrimack R. below FWWTF, Franklin52
#5 Merrimack at Jamie Welch, Boscawen41
#6 Merrimack at US Route 4, Canterbury20
#7 Contoocook at Rivco, Penacook63
#8 Merrimack at Sewalls Falls, Concord51
#9 Merrimack at Manchester St., Concord51
#10 Merrimack at Blue Seal, Bow52
#11 Merrimack at Garvins Falls, Bow74

Please join us in recognizing and thanking our Adopt-a-River Site Sponsors that make the Upper Merrimack Monitoring Program possible (listed in order of their sponsored sites).
Watts Regulator / Webster Valve
Franklin Savings Bank
Franklin Waste Water Treatment Plant (two sites)
Elektrisola
Nelson Analytical
Essex Hydro
Aries Engineering
GZA Environmental
Granite Shore Power (two sites)

You’ll next hear from us in two weeks with the last of this season’s sampling results.

Please visit our fresh and newly designed forum at MerrimackRiver.org/forum and our newUpper Merrimack Watershed Association site at MerrimackRiver.org for further information. Don’t hesitate to contact us at UMMP@MerrimackRiver.org or 603.796.2615 should you have any questions.

Sincerely,

Michele L Tremblay                          Stephen C Landry
Program Manager                             Sampling Supervisor

Rock Basket Days are here again: will you be there?

Rock Basket Days are here again…
Will you be there?

Basket Deployment day: June 28, 2017
Basket Retrieval day: August 16, 2017

Rock basket days are finally here again. We are preparing a roster for the two big days. There is some flexibility in deployment and retrieval but we are shooting for seven weeks from start-to-finish.

Tentatively, we plan to meet in June 28 and August 16 at 4:30 in the NH Department of Envirnmental Services parking lot for training, refresher, safety briefing, and equipment distribution.

Please confirm your participation by completing this brief form or emailing UMWA@MerrimackRiver.org.

Questions? Never hesitate to call us at 603.796.2615.

Merrimack River on list of 10 most threatened rivers in U.S.


Monitor staff
Tuesday, April 12, 2016

When a national organization added the Merrimack River to its list of the 10 most threatened rivers in America, its concern wasn’t one big thing but a whole lot of little things. You’re probably sitting underneath one of those things right now.

“It’s not just pavement, it’s also roofs; anything that water can’t pass through,” said Michele Tremblay, chairwoman of the Upper Merrimack River Local Advisory Council [sic]. “Rain hits it, takes anything along for the ride – petroleum, animal waste, fertilizers, failed septic systems – and off it goes into the nearest brook or stream.

“It’s like a ‘fun slide’ for contaminants,” she said.

American Rivers, a national advocacy group, annually lists 10 rivers it thinks are most endangered. This year’s list includes rivers that flow through 15 states and face threats such as pollution from mountaintop-removal mining in West Virginia and too much water being removed by cities and farmers in California.

For the Merrimack River, which flows from central New Hampshire through northeastern Massachusetts, the problem is more diverse: development that creates impervious surfaces. Roads, parking lots, warehouses and homes all keep rain from seeping into the ground when it hits but instead direct it somewhere else, sometimes creating flooding, sometimes harming underground aquifers that aren’t getting replenished, sometimes carrying pollutants into the river.

“Pavement is rapidly replacing trees across the Merrimack River watershed . . . (and) is the largest threat that the Merrimack River watershed faces today. The U.S. Forest Service ranks the Merrimack River watershed as the most threatened in the country due to the development of forest lands,” writes the group in its report, “2016 America’s Most Endangered Rivers.”

Tackling development and other “non-point-source” causes of water pollution can be difficult, because it involves changes that affect many people, such as new zoning regulations or limitations on fertilizer usage, as compared with something like improving a deficient wastewater treatment plant.

“It is easier to go after the big discharge – I call them the elephants,” Tremblay said. “They’re big, you get an elephant gun. But this is like ants, and we’re all ants, that’s the challenging part.”

American Rivers, in its report, urges the Environmental Protection Agency “to create a regional watershed team and implement key safeguards including protection for important forest lands along rivers and streams, green infrastructure solutions, and improved stormwater management to reduce the excess nutrients and pathogens in the river.”

It points to similar teams in other places facing water quality challenges, including the Chesapeake Bay, Great Lakes and Gulf of Mexico, and also specifically to work in Lawrence, Mass.

The Merrimack River starts in Franklin, where the Pemigewasset and Winnipesaukee rivers join together, and flows 117 miles south into Massachusetts and then east, emptying into the Atlantic Ocean at Newburyport, Mass. The watershed – the total region where any water ends up in the Merrimack River, and thus where development can affect water quality – includes both the Pemigewasset and Winnipesaukee rivers as well as the Contoocook River, a major tributary and thus covers more than half of New Hampshire. The watershed extends north into the White Mountains and west to the edge of the Connecticut River Valley.

(David Brooks can be reached at 369-3313 or dbrooks@cmonitor.com or on Twitter @GraniteGeek)

http://www.concordmonitor.com/News/Science/Merrimack-River-on-list-of-10-most-threatened-rivers-in-U-S-1414014

Fan Fiction: Henry Finds a New Family

Bug Nights 2016, Chapter 8, March 23

Henry Finds a New Family

by Liz Garlo

It was a cold and drizzly night, but inside the St. Paul’s School biological lab, it was warm and the brightly lit aquaria bubbled cheerfully as people began arriving. An air of intimacy developed as the program manager and sampling supervisor and a dozen or so citizen scientists began setting up microscopes so we could start the night’s work. Tonight we would finish the “rough sorting” of the macroinvertebrate samples taken from the Merrimack River. Since there were only two samples left, all agreed to work cooperatively in order to finish them and instead of sitting in the usual two rooms, we all sat in the same room, thereby making sure no one missed any of the lively conversation.

Michele, the woman in the white lab coat, busily hawked raffle tickets for the up and coming river festival, and noted that Henry was wearing pajamas which had no pockets, so he would be forgiven for not being able to buy any tickets. No such reprieves were given to anyone else. Henry, by far the youngest member of the group, explained that the reason he was wearing pajamas was because it was “Wear your Pajamas to School Day,” and besides, they were comfortable. Someone suggested that maybe we could try it too for the next Bug Night, since most of us had missed that ritual in high school. Henry only lamented that his Mother had eaten his (pre) Easter candy, and Michele promptly started doling out little KitKats from a big bag.

Soon, Henry raised his had with a question… he had begun the identification of the aquatic organisms removed from the sample he had just finished. He had recognized that one was new and different. Since Michele was near by, he asked her to come take a look. Quickly, Michele called to Steve, the big taxonomic cahoona, and said, “Bring the keys.” After much shuffling and flipping of pages, the three agreed on the identification. It was a new family. Now to understand the importance of this, you must realize the volunteer program has been repeated annually for over twenty years, and new families are now a rare occurrence. Michele announced that Henry had gotten the taxonomy spot-on as far as our local guide goes, and would be duly recognized by putting his name on a new page for the guide that would appear next year. Wow, does it get any better than that?

Steve needed a break after all that taxonomy, and left the room. Michele told us that she had taken Owen, one of her four rescue cats, to be shaved. Owen is an orange male with six-inch long hair. The problem is that he gets full of static electricity in the winter, so he needed a trim. It was at this time that Michele, being impressed with Henry’s taxonomic prowess, stated that she would be happy to adopt him too. After all, his own mother had eaten his pre-Easter candy. It was at that point that Steve returned to the room to hear Michele promoting her offer of adoption to Henry. A slight look of concern passed quickly over his face. Henry, however, managed to save the day by stating that he thought he might die of cat allergies, preventing the need for further discussion between the husband and wife. Henry passed on the chance of setting a record, getting two new families in one night.

A few days later, Liz, one of the least deserving volunteer citizen scientists who bought raffle tickets, received a text on her cell phone. She had won “The Big Basket” at the river fest. It is truly a fabulous basket. So, yes, it does get better than that.

The Case for Taking Action in the Face of Climate Change

This letter is addressed to all those who, like the ostrich, bury their head in the sand other dark places.  There, now that I have gotten that out of my system, it’s time to identify the challenges other than the obvious social and political ones.
For the sake of limiting this letter’s length I will include only the broad “weather conditions” that respond to climate variations.  The most obvious of these is temperature.  Because of rising global temperature, sea levels are rising and on land floods and droughts are becoming more prevalent.  Much of science requires those involved to study cause and effect.  That is, the scientific method requires identifying the problem.  In this case, it is observable climate changes. 
The most outstanding effect is a greater number of extreme weather occurrences in the temperate zones of the earth.  That is especially true in the northern hemisphere where a greater portion of temperate land mass is located.  Even if you’re not a climatologist, you know that the prevailing winds are from the west in the zone between the subtropical and arctic.  The rotation of the earth causes this to be so. 
Being a scientist is requires the gathering of evidence and developing a hypothesis.  A great number scientists are, and have been, doing detailed studies designed to discover the causes of observable climatic effects.  At a meeting I recently attended I heard it presented as a conundrum as follows:  What we do know, what we don’t know and what we need to know from both global and local perspectives.
We know the Earth’s temperature is rising.  That requires us to ask, is that somehow related to the tripling of weather related disasters since 1960?  Have the heat waves, droughts and forest fires increased in number and intensity as a result?  Is there the likelihood of superstorms like Sandy and Katrina occurring with greater frequency?  Lacking little evidence to the contrary, we must conclude the answer is, yes.
Some of the economic and social effects are grim.  Such things as storm damage, crop losses, public health emergencies and some lesser ones like allergies and respiratory distress.  A study of the costs of hurricane damage, real estate losses, energy costs and the cost of delivering drinkable water concluded that, left unchecked through the end of this century, would require an outlay of 1.9 trillion dollars annually in the United States.  The plain truth is that inaction, in the long run is going to cost more than taking remedial action now.  Pollution does not have to be fuel for our economy.  Dirty profits now will incur health expenses now and in the future.  Efforts to mitigate the carbon emissions are in effect and more are planned for in the future.  Those who deny there is a global crisis need to take their blinders off and remove their rose-colored glasses. The need to take an unbiased look at how we produce and use power.  After they have done that, the should be come part of the solution rather than being part of the problem.
On the local level, we have an entity called the Lakes Region Planning Commission.  In 1990 the put together a regional public utilities and infrastructure plan.  It was a survey and assessment of existing public services with an eye toward future modifications and improvements.  It was developed using a regional perspective with a view toward linking infrastructure across regional boundaries and encouraging cooperation and coordination between communities.  Fast forward twenty-five years and you can observe real progress.  There are many things we know, fewer things we don’t know but the list of things we need to know continues to grow.  Last week the Lakes Region Planning Commission held its 47th annual meeting.  Dr. Lindsey Rustag, author of the previously mentioned conundrum, asked those in attendance to think about what more they needed to know in order to take effective action, environmentally, in their communities.  Perhaps the most effective thing they could do is encourage others to help identify and mitigate problems.  Address needs with organized cooperative actions now and in the future.
Bill Dawson, Northfield

In Franklin, annual kayak run gives way to talk of urban renewal

By Jeremy Blackman, Monitor staff
Thursday, January 1, 2015 (Published in print: Friday, January 2, 2015)

A nice article about how a natural resource = a world class recreational site = economic development. http://www.concordmonitor.com/sports/15046041-95/in-franklin-annual-kayak-run-gives-way-to-talk-of-urban-renewal